In the context of “Autism” or “Asperger’s” it is not “the person” it is the way the person processes information, cognitive, perceptual, language processing, gut and auto-immune issues, learning disabilities, learning difficulties etc – that isn’t “the person” it is how they process information, if someone without autism was hypothetically diagnosed “non-autism syndrome” (I dislike the word “neurotypical” for the reasons of reverse prejudice and that fact it doesn’t exist not one person fits in a tidy demographic) do you think they would say that is “all of me”, “all of my being”, “all of my soul” maybe not for the personality traits which get lost in the the self (either projected on to the person or the person themselves) through seeing the diagnosis as “all” not “part of” I find this rather sad.
DID A LATE DIAGNOSIS HELP ME GAIN ME SENSE OF “ME”?
As a person diagnosed in my my late twenties maybe indirectly that has helped me see myself living as person not a “label” that to me is far more freeing I am happy go lucky, idiosyncratic, mercurial, solitary, creative, poetic, silly, have a laugh, like nice meals and good company the list goes on I am a “human” and there is great empowerment in reminding ANYBODY (regardless of disability or otherwise) that they are human/person first.
I have noted some personality types I have regardless of being on the autism spectrum or not all human beings have differing personality types.
- Exuberant Personality Type
- Serious Personality Type
- Devoted Personality Type
- Idiosyncratic Personality Type
- Solitary Personality Type
- Vigilant Personality Type
- Leisurely Personality Type
- Self-Sacrificing Personality Type
- Mercurial Personality Type
- Sensitive Personality Type
- Inventive Personality Type
- Self-Confident Personality Type
- Aggressive Personality Type
“ONE SIZE FITS ALL” & POPULAR STEREOTYPES
I also question the use of a “one size fits all demographic” if you think about it that makes no sense at all how can a person with autism be like ever other person with autism? Think the same? Process things same etc. I think it is about looking at the specifics and the mechanics not the stereotypes or generalisations that are about (all people with autism created things that progressed humanity for example). How about socially binding things? The real world with real people in it? How about looking at that instead even if a person on spectrum did create something unique shouldn’t the credit be on the creation not just the that fact that the person has autism? If anybody else had created something wouldn’t you do the same thing?
People get left out, feel more different than they may have initially felt, parents maybe left confused also, its time to strip away the politics and if one is going to be any help all lets focus of the what works. As a point of the reflection the baby in the top right hand corner what do you see? Do you see a baby? a little person/human-being?
Paul Isaacs 2015